The Australian Standing Stones

- A Monumental Non-Sense

The Australian Standing Stones at Glen Innes were erected in 1992, without consultation of the Celtic-Australian population at large, in order to honour the people of Celtic descent that have contributed to the nation of Australia over the two centuries or so since European settlement. These stones are based on ancient constructs that dot the British Isles and parts of Western Europe. Archaeological evidence, however, firmly places the constructions of these circles several centuries before the arrival of the Celts in these areas. As such, this brings into question the validity of such a monument in Australia to commemorate the efforts of a people that had no historical or cultural relationship with these structures.

The first archaeological evidence of the Celts in Europe can be found at Hallstatt, in modern day Austria. This early culture was distinctive in its largely geometric-based art (Ellis, 1998, p11), and is dated from c1200BC. The Celtic people further migrated westward across Europe creating the tribes of Gaul. From here, during the fifth to first centuries BC, the Celts spread to, and populated, Britain and Ireland. The first archaeological evidence for the construction of the megalithic stone monuments in this region begins at c3100BC, in the case of Stonehenge (Stonehenge, 1996). This clearly puts the Celts outside of the time frame for construction of such monuments.

What little that has survived of actual Celtic life comes from historians at a time of military expansion of which commenced with Julius Caesar's invasion of Gaul circa 58BC (Gardner, 1982), and the subsequent annexure of Britain in the first century AD, to the invasion of the Saxons in the fifth century AD (Blake & Lloyd, 2002, pp11-12). As such, very little of the actual lives of the Celtic people survive in written form, as the Celts did not "write native books of philosophy, history and such" (Ellis, pp17-18), meaning modern scholars rely on collated information from ancient Roman and Greek sources, while fringe special interest groups make spurious claims connecting Celtic people with monuments and traditions that pre-date them¹ , one of the most prominent groups being Wicca².

In the intervening years of domination and being conquered, the Celts have achieved a great deal even without their culture "intact", so to speak. Modern Celtic-Australians who have contributed to Australian society not only include the miners, farmers and general labourers (bbc.co.uk/wales history: Australia, n.d.), but also well known figures including Banjo Patterson, Lachlan Macquarie, several Prime Ministers (New World Celts, 2006), including John Curtin (John Joseph Curtin, 2001) and Ian Clunies Ross (Australian Academy of Science: Biographical Memoirs of Deceased Fellows, 1995). Few, if any, of these Modern Celtic-Australians would associate themselves with the remnants of a pre-Celtic culture halfway across the world, and indeed many everyday Modern Celtic-Australian do not relate with these monuments unless somehow involved with one of the aforementioned fringe groups.

Given that the Australian Standing Stones were erected for the purpose of honouring people of Celtic descent that have made contributions to the development of Australia as a Nation, the monument at Glen Innes makes no real sense. As they stand, they represent culturally based notions of spurious Celtic connections with ancient monuments displaced in both space and time to Celtic-Australians. Modern Celtic-Australians from Cymru (Wales), Kernow (Cornwall), Eire (Ireland) and Alba (Scotland) have made real contributions through hard work, political leadership and development of distinctively "Australian" notions of culture and image, it therefore would have been more appropriate for a monument to be erected that incorporated these achievements. Does this, then, leave the way open for the creation of a monument that reflects these achievements in the future?

Notes

¹ Many of these groups that associate these monuments with Celtic people ignore the fact that these circles' prime function seems to be to mark the winter and summer Solstices. However, the discovery of the "Celtic" calendar at Coligny clearly shows that Celtic people not did mark these occasions with any great importance. See http://caeraustralis.com.au/celtcalmain.htm, and references therein.
²However, see "Why Wicca is not Celtic".

References:

Australian Academy of Science: Biographical Memoirs of Deceased Fellows (1995). Retrieved February 15 2006 from http://www.asap.unimelb.edu.au/bsparcs/aasmemoirs/ross.htm

bbc.co.uk/wales history: Australia ( n.d.). Retrieved February 14, 2006 from http://www.bbc.co.uk/wales/history/sites/cag/pages/cag-oz.shtml

Blake, S., & Lloyd, S. (2002). The Lost Legend of Arthur, London: Rider

Ellis, P. B. (1998). The Celts. London: Constable & Robinson Ltd.

Gardner, J. F. (Revised 1982). The Conquest of Gaul, London: Penguin Group.

John Joseph Curtin (2001). Retrieved February 15, 2006 from http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/5557/curtin.html

New World Celts (2006). Retrieved February 14, 2006 from http://www.newworldcelts.org/australia.html

Stonehenge (1996). Retrieved November 26, 2005 from http://www.stonepages.com/england/england